- Court ruled educational institution’s use of usufruct construction for input tax deductions was an abuse of law
- Institution ordered to repay improperly deducted VAT
- Repayment amounts to €3,274 for first quarter of 2000 and €66,266 for period from April 2000 to December 2003
- Lesson learned: even if transaction meets legal requirements, it can still be considered abuse of law if main purpose is tax advantage contrary to VAT legislation objectives.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
- VAT Implications for ‘Free’ Online Services: Legal Challenges and Potential Impact on SMEs
- Court Denies Tax Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs as Private Expenses
- No deduction of input tax for private advisory fees shareholders
