- Landsskatteretten found that Skattestyrelsen did not provide enough evidence to prove that the original decisions were delivered
- Special circumstances were found to justify extraordinary reopening of the case
- The taxpayer should have reacted earlier to the first period of VAT assessment
- The deadline for reopening was missed for the first period, but was met for the remaining periods
- Lack of specific information about the preliminary assessments and subsequent VAT amounts contributed to the taxpayer’s lack of knowledge
Source: info.skat.dk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- Acquittal Due to Insufficient Evidence and Limitation in Serious VAT Fraud Case
- Denial of VAT and Expense Deductions for Subcontractor Invoices Due to Insufficient Documentation
- Danish Court Rules Tattoo Studios Not Eligible for VAT Exemption on Artistic Activity
- Denmark Clarifies VAT Treatment for LLC-to-Partnership Restructuring and Bonus Payments
- Court upholds tax authority’s VAT assessment for tattoo business lacking proper documentation
