- X is a director of a holding company and STAK, which holds all shares in the holding company.
- Workspaces and archive storage are not accessible separately and do not have their own sanitary facilities.
- X rents the premises to the holding company, which is subject to VAT, and deducts input tax.
- The court rules that X is not entitled to deduct input tax and is not an entrepreneur for VAT purposes.
- The use of the premises is governed by the employment relationship between X and the holding company and has no independent significance.
- The appeal to the principle of neutrality fails and the appeal is unfounded.
- The rental of workspaces in a private residence to a related entity does not automatically qualify as an entrepreneurial activity for VAT purposes.
- The existence of a separate lease agreement and the charging of VAT by the landlord are not sufficient to establish entrepreneurship.
- The substance of the arrangement and the economic relationship between the parties must be considered.
- In this case, the court found that the use of the premises was ancillary to X’s employment with the holding company and did not constitute an independent business activity.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands Sets Out Four-Phase Plan for Implementing EU ViDA
- Guide to Netherlands Article 23 VAT Deferment: Benefits, Application, and Compliance for Online Sellers
- No VAT Deduction for Luxury Apartment Purchase: Business Use Not Proven, Court Rules
- Rental of Workroom by Silent Partnership: Entrepreneurship Confirmed, VAT Deduction Denied Due to Private Use
- Court Overturns Tax Office Decision on VAT Deduction for Healthcare Complex Development
