- The case involves a dispute over VAT on short-stay rentals
- The taxpayer argues that their apartment rentals compete with hotels and are similar to hotel accommodation
- The tax authority argues that the rentals do not meet the criteria for competition with hotels or holiday accommodations
- The court must determine if the rentals have a similar function to hotel or holiday accommodations
- The court considers previous rulings that emphasize the need for rentals to provide short-term accommodation without the tenant being responsible for inventory
- The court ultimately rules that the taxpayer’s rentals do not qualify as similar to hotel or holiday accommodations and are subject to VAT.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients














