The taxpayer, an insurance intermediary, marketed telematics car insurance for 17- to 25-year-olds, receiving commission from the insurer. They initially restricted input tax on the provision and fitting of telematics devices but later claimed input tax, arguing that the provision and fitting were taxable supplies to policyholders. The taxpayer’s arguments were dismissed at the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) and Upper Tribunal (UT), which concluded there was no separate taxable supply.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK VAT Threshold Debate: Growth-Boosting Increase or Revenue-Raising Decrease at Autumn Budget?
- Chancellor Proposes Raising VAT Registration Threshold to £100,000 to Boost UK Economy
- ICS2 Implementation for Northern Ireland: Transition Details and Support for Carriers by HMRC
- FTT Rules Ferrero’s Nutella Biscuits Not Partly Chocolate-Covered, Zero-Rated for VAT
- HMRC Wins Upper Tribunal Case Against Mini Umbrella Company Fraud, Tightens Compliance Rules