The taxpayer won at the FTT by arguing for the use of a floor-based method as a proxy for property overheads, but this decision was overturned on appeal. The UT found that the FTT had failed to address HMRC’s core argument on dual use and agreed that the taxpayer’s method was flawed. The floor-based method does not provide a more precise determination of economic use compared to the standard method.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Fintua Sponsors Indirect Taxes Annual Conference 2025 in London (Nov 12)
- HMRC Guidance: Guidance Check how to tell HMRC about VAT Return errors
- Essential Guide to VAT Refunds for DIY Housebuilders: What You Can and Cannot Claim
- Ed Miliband Hints at Possible VAT Cut on Energy Bills in Upcoming Autumn Budget
- Upper Tribunal Remits VAT Exemption Case for Cosmetic Treatments to First-tier Tribunal