- ICAEW responds to Treasury/HMRC consultation on carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM).
- Welcomes broad principles of CBAM.
- Cautions that businesses will need more time to comply.
- Five-month deadline from the first accounting period may be too short for accurate emissions data collection.
- Quarterly reporting from 2028 could be overly burdensome for businesses.
- Encourages the government to take a phased approach to implementation.
Source: taxjournal.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Keir Starmer Faces Criticism for Not Ruling Out VAT Increase Amid £30bn Financial Gap
- ICS2 Implementation Delayed: Businesses Can Use ICSNI for ENS Declarations Until December 2025
- First-tier Tribunal Rules Nitrous Oxide Not Zero-rated for VAT as Food Ingredient
- Understanding HMRC’s GfC14: Tax Reliefs and Compliance in Freeports and Free Zones
- UK Chancellor Considers Adjusting VAT Nil-Rate and 5% Rate for 2025 Budget Funding