The Court of Appeal of The Hague ruled that the tax inspector did not violate the prohibition on reformatio in peius. X received three ex officio VAT assessments and default fines for not submitting VAT returns. X later made VAT supplements for the same quarters of 2019, declaring the amounts of the ex officio assessments and default penalty as VAT already paid. The tax inspector imposed additional VAT assessments, deducting the amount of the ex officio assessment, and then imposed an additional assessment for the amounts wrongly deducted. The court ruled that the inspector did not violate the prohibition on reformatio in peius, as the additional assessments were for the VAT due declared by X.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Memorandum in response to the report on the Bill on the retention of a reduced VAT rate on culture, media and sport
- Netherlands Sets Out Four-Phase Plan for Implementing EU ViDA
- Guide to Netherlands Article 23 VAT Deferment: Benefits, Application, and Compliance for Online Sellers
- No VAT Deduction for Luxury Apartment Purchase: Business Use Not Proven, Court Rules
- Rental of Workroom by Silent Partnership: Entrepreneurship Confirmed, VAT Deduction Denied Due to Private Use
