The dispute is about whether VAT should be paid on the partially recharged third-party liability insurance premium to the Staff Partnership. The court ruled that the hospital does not provide the indemnity service, as it is carried out by the insurer, so the recharged premium is not subject to VAT. The court also stated that there are no other relevant services in this case.
Source Taxence
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Increase on Hotels Could Lead to Billions in Losses for Tourism Sector
- No VAT Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs, Court Rules Against A BV
- Proposed VAT Increase on Tourism Yields No Net Gain, Faces Parliamentary Vote
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
