The dispute is about whether VAT should be paid on the partially recharged third-party liability insurance premium to the Staff Partnership. The court ruled that the hospital does not provide the indemnity service, as it is carried out by the insurer, so the recharged premium is not subject to VAT. The court also stated that there are no other relevant services in this case.
Source Taxence
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026
