The dispute is about whether VAT should be paid on the partially recharged third-party liability insurance premium to the Staff Partnership. The court ruled that the hospital does not provide the indemnity service, as it is carried out by the insurer, so the recharged premium is not subject to VAT. The court also stated that there are no other relevant services in this case.
Source Taxence
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
