- The court assesses whether the inspector correctly determined that the representative is not part of the VAT group
- The court concludes that the representative is part of the VAT group as of July 1, 2022
- Only bodies and individuals who are entrepreneurs for VAT purposes can be part of a VAT group
- The court determines that the rental of spaces in the home to the BV is an economic activity
- The court disagrees with the inspector’s argument that the rental is not an economic activity
- The court’s decision is not in conflict with previous rulings by the Supreme Court
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Increase on Hotels Could Lead to Billions in Losses for Tourism Sector
- No VAT Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs, Court Rules Against A BV
- Proposed VAT Increase on Tourism Yields No Net Gain, Faces Parliamentary Vote
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?