- Taxpayer is a company involved in restaurant business registered for income tax and GST
- Investigation found Taxpayer suppressed cash sales, under-reported GST and income tax
- Default assessment issued with evasion shortfall penalties
- Dispute raised by Taxpayer, referred to Tax Counsel Office for adjudication
- Main issues include under-reporting cash sales, offsetting costs without records, reassessment of GST, liability for shortfall penalty
- TCO decided Commissioner validly assessed Taxpayer, cash sales under-reported, no offset for costs without evidence, correct reassessment of GST and income tax
- Evasion penalties correctly imposed
- Legislative references to Tax Administration Act for preliminary issues
- Commissioner’s decision to assess without NOPA cannot be disputed by Taxpayer
Source: taxtechnical.ird.govt.nz
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "New Zealand"
- E-Invoicing in New Zealand: Key FAQs, Compliance Steps, and How ecosio Supports Your Journey
- New Zealand’s Phased E-Invoicing Rollout: Government-Led, Peppol Standard, Mandatory for Large Suppliers 2027
- New Zealand’s Phased E-Invoicing Rollout: Peppol Standard, Government-Led, Mandatory for Large B2G Suppliers 2027
- Briefing Document & Podcast: E-Invoicing and E-Reporting in New Zealand
- New Zealand GST Rules for Foreign Digital Service Providers and Online Marketplaces













