- ET and her husband WT acquired and sold various plots without paying VAT
- Tax authorities imposed a VAT debt, claiming that the sale of the plots constitutes an economic activity
- The referring judge in Poland is unsure about the interpretation of the term ‘economic activity’ in the VAT Directive
- The judge questions whether it is relevant that the land’s destination was changed at the couple’s initiative
- The judge also wants to know if a group of jointly acting natural persons falls under the term ‘person’ in the VAT Directive
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ C-472/24 (Žaidimų valiuta) – AG Opinion – VAT Treatment of In-Game Gold Transactions
- ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko Operations) – AG Opinion – VAT Treatment of Loyalty Program Points
- ECJ Upholds Czech Joint VAT Liability in Fuel Fraud Case, Validates EU Law Compliance
- CJEU Rules on VAT for Transfer Price Adjustments in Arcomet Towercranes Case C-726/23
- Agenda of the ECJ VAT cases – 4 AG Opinions, 1 Hearings till October 10, 2025
