Anbi X provides supportive care in a domestic setting to people in the terminal phase of their lives X submitted claims for refunds totalling €42.778 submitted, but these were late
The Inspector declared the requests inadmissible and ruled that the amount of the refund was nil X lodged appeals and appeals, but these were declared unfounded
The Court of Appeal ruled that the delay was not excusable and the reliance on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations did not succeed
The request for compensation for non-material damage was rejected, as there was no breach of the reasonable time limit.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Increase on Hotels Could Lead to Billions in Losses for Tourism Sector
- No VAT Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs, Court Rules Against A BV
- Proposed VAT Increase on Tourism Yields No Net Gain, Faces Parliamentary Vote
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
