- The Upper Tribunal allowed the taxpayer’s appeal in the case of ThyssenKrupp Materials (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC
- A single error on a bill of discharge does not give rise to a customs debt under article 204 of the Community Customs Code
- ThyssenKrupp Materials (UK) Ltd claimed inward processing relief under the suspension system for components used to manufacture aircrafts
- HMRC issued a demand for nearly £8.9m in customs duty and import VAT, citing errors in quarterly bills of discharge
- The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the appeal, but the Upper Tribunal disagreed, stating that errors must have a significant effect to incur a customs debt
- This decision sets a precedent and injects common sense into the operation of the inward processing regime.
Source: rpc.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Budget 2025: VAT E-Invoicing, Digital Compliance, and Post-Brexit Tax Reforms Announced
- FTT Rules HMRC Closure Notice Bars VAT Registration: Hairdresser’s Turnover Below Threshold, Appeal Allowed
- UK Tribunal Rules Self-Employed Hairdresser Not Liable for VAT Registration Under Rent-a-Chair Model
- EU Insists on VAT Representative for UK Firms Despite British Objections to Import Rules
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing as of April 2029
