- The court supported the position of the tax authorities regarding the legality of increasing the amount of VAT liability
- The conclusions of the tax authority were based on financial transactions aimed at forming a tax credit without actually carrying out the transactions
- The court found that the documents provided by the plaintiff did not confirm the execution of work or delivery of goods, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff’s appeal
- The Cassation Administrative Court rejected the plaintiff’s appeal and upheld the decisions of the lower courts from 2017 and 2018
Source: od.tax.gov.ua
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Ukraine"
- Government to Submit VAT Bill for Entrepreneurs as IMF Condition, Adoption Deadline March 2026
- VAT Liabilities and Credits for Commission Agreements: Key Rules for Import Operations in Ukraine
- Conditional Supply of Assets upon VAT Deregistration: When and How to Calculate Tax Liabilities
- Ukraine Extends VAT Exemption for Energy Equipment Imports Through 2028
- How to Add New Types of Activities to the VAT Payer Data Table in Ukraine
