- The court supported the position of the tax authorities regarding the legality of increasing the amount of VAT liability
- The conclusions of the tax authority were based on financial transactions aimed at forming a tax credit without actually carrying out the transactions
- The court found that the documents provided by the plaintiff did not confirm the execution of work or delivery of goods, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff’s appeal
- The Cassation Administrative Court rejected the plaintiff’s appeal and upheld the decisions of the lower courts from 2017 and 2018
Source: od.tax.gov.ua
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Ukraine"
- Ukraine Amends VAT Law: New Rules Effective October 1, 2025, Until January 1, 2028
- Eligibility Criteria for VAT Budget Reimbursement: Key Rules and Restrictions Explained
- Is Property Management Agreement Subject to Mandatory VAT Registration?
- Temporary Import and Re-export of Equipment: Impact on VAT Registration Threshold Operations?
- Requirements for Submitting VAT Payer Data Table and Explanation in 2025
