- The court supported the position of the tax authorities regarding the legality of increasing the amount of VAT liability
- The conclusions of the tax authority were based on financial transactions aimed at forming a tax credit without actually carrying out the transactions
- The court found that the documents provided by the plaintiff did not confirm the execution of work or delivery of goods, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff’s appeal
- The Cassation Administrative Court rejected the plaintiff’s appeal and upheld the decisions of the lower courts from 2017 and 2018
Source: od.tax.gov.ua
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Ukraine"
- How to Check Non-Resident VAT Payer Status Online in Ukraine: Step-by-Step Guide
- VAT Credit Rules for Solar Power Plant Construction in 2026: General Principles and Timing
- Revaluation of Non-Current Assets in 2026: VAT Implications Clarified by Tax Authorities
- Offsetting VAT Debt Using Negative Value: Consequences and Penalties in Ukraine
- Mandatory VAT for Sole Proprietors in 2027: Three Key Risks Highlighted by Zhelezniak














