- Advocate-General Ettema concludes that article 37d of the VAT Act 1968 may apply to the transfer of a rental business
- X BV purchases land in 2017 and leases it for a long period, then rents out a VAT-exempt care complex to a foundation
- The ownership of the complex is transferred without VAT being charged, based on article 37d of the VAT Act 1968
- The Court rules in favor of X BV, stating that the transfer is not a VAT-taxable supply of a new immovable property
- The State Secretary appeals the decision, arguing that the economic activity of X BV is ‘project development’ and the buyer does not intend to continue this activity
- Advocate-General Ettema advises the Supreme Court to dismiss the State Secretary’s appeal, explaining the concept of a rental business and the necessary elements for its continuation.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
- No VAT Fiscal Unity: Foundation and BV Lack Required Financial Interdependence, Court Rules
- No Breach of Legitimate Expectation in VAT Reassessment for Foundation X, Court Rules
- No VAT group due to lack of majority of material control
