The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal ruled that an additional VAT assessment was upheld for only one plot of land out of the six supplied by X bv. The appeal to the Real Estate Decree was upheld for the other two plots. The Court found that although there was a supply of building land for three plots, the remaining demolition work undertaken by X bv meant that they did not constitute building land according to the Real Estate Decree. Therefore, VAT was not due on the supplies of the three other plots.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
- No VAT Fiscal Unity: Foundation and BV Lack Required Financial Interdependence, Court Rules
- No Breach of Legitimate Expectation in VAT Reassessment for Foundation X, Court Rules
- No VAT group due to lack of majority of material control
