In a case involving a Minnesota-based company’s use of equipment in South Dakota for one day, the taxpayer has petitioned the US Supreme Court to consider whether South Dakota’s imposition of an unapportioned use tax on the fair market value of its movable construction equipment violates the fair apportionment requirement of the Commerce Clause.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United States"
- Who Has the Authority to Levy Tariffs?
- Texas – New Law Modifies Definition of Video Service and Excludes Streaming Content
- Illinois – General Information Letter Comments on Taxability of GenAI Services Provided via Website or App
- Washington – DOR Provides Guidance on New Law Taxing Certain Advertising Services Beginning October 1
- Excise Taxes and Fees on Wireless Services Up Again in 2025