In a case involving a Minnesota-based company’s use of equipment in South Dakota for one day, the taxpayer has petitioned the US Supreme Court to consider whether South Dakota’s imposition of an unapportioned use tax on the fair market value of its movable construction equipment violates the fair apportionment requirement of the Commerce Clause.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United States"
- Florida Repeals Business Rent Tax Effective October 1, 2025: New Guidance Issued
- Washington Businesses Must Collect Sales Tax on Certain Advertising Services Starting October 2025
- Washington Expands Sales Tax to Additional Services: FAQs on ESSB 5814 Law Changes
- Alabama Localities Challenge Simplified Seller’s Use Tax Validity Post-Wayfair in Court Case
- Louisiana Expands Sales Tax to Include Digital Products and Services Starting 2025