- The case involves a dispute over the calculation of a foreign insurance company’s VAT refund
- The High Court ruled that the company could not include revenue from insurance sales in another country in its VAT refund calculation
- The court found that the transactions were considered to be carried out in the foreign country, not in Denmark
- The court also rejected the company’s argument that the transactions were considered as intermediation under the VAT law
- The Tax Ministry was cleared of the company’s main claim, but acknowledged that some costs allocated to the foreign branch could be included in the VAT refund calculation
- The court did not grant the company’s request for a referral of the case for further investigation.
Source: info.skat.dk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- Municipality’s Development Agreements Not Subject to VAT as Public Authority, Tax Council Rules
- Conditional Prison Sentence for VAT Fraud Using Straw Man and Preliminary Assessments, Eastern High Court 2025
- Court Ruling: Multiple Defendants Convicted of Serious Tax, VAT, and Withholding Tax Fraud with Fake Invoices
- VAT Liability for Invoiced Sales Tax: Employee vs. Self-Employed Status in Subcontractor Agreements
- Extraordinary VAT Assessment: Gross Negligence and Six-Month Notice Period Compliance Disputed














