- The requirements for the recipient of services under § 13b (5) sentence 1 of the Value Added Tax Act (UStG) were discussed in the judgment.
- The use of a valid VAT identification number by the recipient is not decisive for the shift of the tax liability under § 13b (5) sentence 1 of the UStG.
- The shift of the tax liability from the supplier to the recipient benefits the supplier and places the burden of proof on the supplier regarding the conditions of § 13b (5) sentence 1, sentence 1, paragraph 1 UStG.
- A decision based on the burden of proof can only be made in financial court proceedings in case the facts are unclear.
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- VAT Registration in Germany 2026: Requirements, Process, and Key Tax Numbers Explained
- VAT Returns in Germany 2026: Filing Deadlines, Frequencies, and ELSTER Submission Guide
- German VAT 2026: Rates, Rules, and Key Changes for E-commerce and Service Providers
- F-Gas and Ozone Regulation: Reporting Deadlines, ATLAS Requirements, and New Compliance Obligations for Companies
- Input VAT Deduction on Import VAT for EXW Deliveries: Munich Tax Court Decision of 09.12.2025














