The CJEU ruled that Romania wrongly applied a higher excise duty for diesel oil to energy products re-entered into Bitulpetrolium’s tax warehouse due to unmet conditions. Bitulpetrolium, a producer and wholesaler of fuels, disagrees with the tax authorities’ assessments and argues that it provided necessary documentation and did not claim a refund of excise duty. The case has been referred to the Romanian court for a preliminary ruling.
Source Taxlive
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Case C-726/23: Arcomet Towercranes Decision Clarifies Intra-Group VAT and Transfer Pricing Rules
- EU and Morocco reach agreement to extend preferential tariff treatment to Western Sahara
- Comments on ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko) – Loyalty programs and VAT: AG’s opinion in Lyko case brings new perspectives
- Comments on ECJ C-535/24 (Svilosa) – VAT Deduction on Recovery Actions Not Considered Taxable Service
- EU States Move Early on €2 Customs Fee
