The CJEU ruled that Romania wrongly applied a higher excise duty for diesel oil to energy products re-entered into Bitulpetrolium’s tax warehouse due to unmet conditions. Bitulpetrolium, a producer and wholesaler of fuels, disagrees with the tax authorities’ assessments and argues that it provided necessary documentation and did not claim a refund of excise duty. The case has been referred to the Romanian court for a preliminary ruling.
Source Taxlive
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Confirms TP Adjustments as VAT-Applicable Services, Requires Supporting Documentation
- Court of Justice Rules on VAT for Intra-Group Services and Evidence Requirements for Deductions
- ECJ Rules Compensation Payments in Transfer Pricing as Taxable Supply for VAT Purposes
- ECJ Rules Non-Transactional Profit Adjustments by Principal Are VAT-Applicable Services in Arcomet Case
- Understanding VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing: Insights from Arcomet Case C-726/23
