The Amsterdam Court of Appeal upheld the ruling that X’s permit to act as a limited fiscal representative and the Article 23 permit were rightly revoked. X was transporting goods to EU countries other than the UK for Chinese companies without a permanent establishment in Europe, and listing them on the UK VAT number, which deprived EU authorities of their supervisory functions. The court found this conduct sufficient ground for revocation of the permits, and ruled that the withdrawals did not infringe the principle of proportionality.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Rules Low-Care Hospice Room Rentals with Meals Subject to VAT, Allowing Tax Deduction
- Consultation on BPM Refund Changes for Export: Focus on Vehicles Under Twelve Years
- Court Rules in Favor of Tax Deduction for Healthcare Complex Development Costs in Appeal
- Court Rules on Tax Assessment: Rental of Office Room Not Eligible for VAT Deduction
- Pincvision CIO: Combining Technology and Human Behavior for Secure International Trade Data
