- VAT was due on services provided between two companies in the same VAT group
- Services were not invoiced or paid until after the supplier had left the group
- Prudential and Silverfleet Capital Ltd were involved in the case
- Performance fees of £9 million triggered in 2014 and 2015
- HMRC argued for VAT to be charged on the performance fee when invoiced and paid
- FTT initially ruled in favor of Prudential, but Upper Tribunal allowed HMRC’s appeal
- Court of Appeal ultimately found that VAT was chargeable on the services
- Deemed supply was made after Silverfleet had left the VAT group
- Prudential’s appeal was dismissed on a 2-1 majority in the CoA
Source: rossmartin.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- High Court Rules Curaçao Bank Unaware of £220m VAT Fraud, Dismissing Liquidators’ Claims
- Hippodrome Casino’s VAT Recovery Appeal Rejected by Tribunal, Standard Method Upheld
- Rethinking Britain’s VAT: Simplify Rules and Expand Coverage for Economic Stability
- UK Implements EPR Scheme for Packaging, Modulated Fees Begin in 2026
- HMRC Announces New Vaping Products Duty and Stamps Effective October 2026