- The court received a request to postpone a hearing due to the vacation of the party involved
- The request for postponement was not made promptly after receiving the invitation and did not provide sufficient reasons
- The request for postponement was rejected by the court
- An invoice for late payment was sent to the party involved, with a promise to reduce the associated costs to zero
- The party involved submitted a tax return late, resulting in a late payment penalty being rightfully imposed
- The level of culpability does not affect the imposition of a late payment penalty, unless there is a complete absence of fault or a justifiable position
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026














