The Court of Appeal of ‘s-Hertogenbosch ruled that X cannot rely on a 1995 audit for applying the reduced VAT rate to fishing lure feed. X failed to demonstrate authorization for applying the reduced rate. The audit report did not mention the applicable rate for fish bait, and there is no implicit approval for the reduced rate. X’s action is currently justified due to the admissibility of the cross-appeal she has filed.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Tax Authorities Announce Major Changes to 13th Directive VAT Refund Procedure
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- VAT OSS in the Netherlands: Managing Multi-Channel Marketplace Sales and Bookkeeping Challenges
- Cabinet Response to ViDA E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Report Sent to House of Representatives
- Evaluation of Abolishing Reduced VAT Rate on Accommodation Scheduled for 2028














