- Tax authorities can deny a refund of overpaid VAT on the ground of unjust enrichment.
- Under EU law, the issue is complex and has been misunderstood by tax officers, legal advisors, and courts.
- However, it has been authoritatively stated that unjust enrichment in a B2C scenario is virtually impossible.
- This is because the supplier will always suffer, either by losing sales if they increase prices to account for higher VAT, or by losing profits if they cannot increase prices.
- The only exception is if all suppliers of a product with inelastic demand make the same mistake, which is very rare in practice.
Source Fabian Barth
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Questions to ECJ – Quick Fixes Under Scrutiny: Is an EU VAT ID a Substantive Requirement for Zero-Rating?
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ VAT C-622/23 (RHTB) – VAT Implications in Work Contract Cancellations
- New GC VAT Case: C-689/25 (British Company) – No details known yet
- Comments on ECJ Case C-726/23 (Arcomet) – ECJ clarifies VAT rules for Transfer Pricing adjustments in intragroup transactions
- ETAF Calls for Modern, Harmonised VAT Rules for EU Travel and Tourism Sector Reform
