- Washington Supreme Court ruled that a tax on federally subsidized wireless services violates the Supremacy Clause
- The tax imposition on reimbursement funds received through a federal program was found to violate intergovernmental tax immunity
- The Court reversed a Washington Court of Appeals opinion in favor of a telecommunication company
- The transactions involving a nonprofit appointed to administer the federal program were deemed non-taxable
- The intermediary nonprofit was created to effect the federal government’s telecom policy objectives
Source: www2.deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United States"
- Larimer County Sales Tax Rate Rises to 1.05% Effective January 1, 2026
- Grand Junction Eliminates Vendor Fee: Full Sales Tax Remittance Required Starting January 1, 2026
- San Antonio Eliminates Sports Venue Tax, Updates Local Sales Tax Rates Effective January 2026
- Illinois Sales Tax: Rates, Nexus, Exemptions, and Filing Requirements for Businesses
- 2026 State Sales Tax Updates: Food, Digital Products, Nexus, and Penalties Explained














