- A VAT deduction must be denied if the taxpayer knew or should have known that their purchase was involved in VAT fraud
- The determination of whether the taxpayer knew or should have known depends on factual questions to be assessed by the tax authority or the Administrative Court
- Reference to previous decisions by the Administrative Court
- European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:AT:VWGH:2024:RA2023130160.L01
Source: ris.bka.gv.at
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Austria"
- ECJ Rules No VAT Liability for Incorrect Rates Charged to Non-Taxable Consumers
- Tax Implications of Hobby in Castle Leasing and Management Under § 2 Abs 5 Z 2 UStG
- VAT Refund for Foreign Entrepreneurs on Austrian Real Estate Services
- Hobby Horse Breeding and Boarding: Tax Implications and Profitability Assessment Changes
- Input Tax Deduction for Test Vehicles Used Exclusively for Development Purposes