The dispute before the District Court of Noord-Holland is primarily about the place of business for turnover tax purposes and whether the invoices paid relate to VAT-exempt mediation services in respect of bonds. The court found that the company’s registered office is in the Netherlands, and based on various factors, the place of service is determined to be the Netherlands. The company failed to provide sufficient evidence to support that the activities performed by foreign service providers can be regarded as mediation in respect of bonds. Therefore, the inspector was right to reject the objections.
Source Taxence
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Internet consultation on new VAT rules for platform economy starting July 2028
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025