- Advocate General Nicholas Emiliou delivered his opinion on DAC6’s professional privilege waiver
- He suggested that the CJEU should answer questions from the Belgian Constitutional Court
- Emiliou stated that reporting aggressive cross-border tax arrangements does not breach Union law
- Member States can only exempt intermediaries from reporting if it breaches professional secrecy for lawyers
- The conclusions of Emiliou are not binding, and the Court will deliver its judgment in the future.
Source: etaf.tax
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Transfer Pricing and VAT: Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Ruling
- ICS2 Implementation Delayed: Businesses Can Use ICSNI for ENS Declarations Until December 2025
- EU Advocate General: Hotels Must Split Services for VAT, Including Breakfast, Under German Law
- CJEU Decision Highlights VAT and Transfer Pricing Interplay in SC Arcomet Towercranes Case
- Understanding the Reemtsma Principle: EU VAT Reimbursements and Recent CJEU Rulings
