- The Italian tax authorities, with the support of the Commission and AG Collins, argued that a non-operational taxable person cannot claim the protection of legitimate expectations to deduct input VAT if the goods and services acquired were not used for VAT-liable transactions, as required by Article 168 of the VAT Directive.
- However, the CJEU rejected this argument, ruling that the Italian concept of an operational taxable person is overruled.
- The CJEU stated that denying the right to deduct input VAT based on a revenue threshold unrelated to fraud or abuse is not acceptable.
- Indeed, it is clear from the case law of the CJEU that the existence of a right to deduction cannot be made conditional on the size of the turnover, namely by making it subject to a criterion relating, in particular, to the result of the economic activity (CJEU, Marle Participations SARL v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, 5 July 2018, Case C-320/17, paragraph 44 and Volkswagen Financial Services judgment, 18 October 2018, C-153/17, paragraph 46).
Source Yves Bernaerts
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Agenda of the ECJ VAT cases – 4 AG Opinions, 1 Hearings till October 10, 2025
- CJEU Ruling: VAT Applies to Intra-Group Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Arcomet Case
- Non-Payment of Declared VAT Not Considered VAT Fraud, Says Advocate General Kokott
- CJEU Confirms TP Adjustments as VAT-Applicable Services, Requires Supporting Documentation
- CJEU Rules Transfer Pricing Adjustments May Be Subject to VAT for Intragroup Services