The European Union Court of Justice ruled that it is not against EU law for the municipality of Dinkelland to not receive interest payments. This decision is based on the fact that the municipality did not fully exercise its right to deduct VAT due to errors in its accounts. The municipality applied for VAT refunds and reimbursement of tax interest, but the recipient rejected the request. The CJEU ruled that the municipality is not entitled to interest reimbursement in connection with the VAT refund, as it did not fully exercise its right to deduct VAT due to errors in its accounts. The court also noted that the municipality’s situation was partly the result of retroactive changes in calculating deductible VAT, which were adopted under its sole responsibility.
Source Taxlive
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Rules Non-Transactional Profit Adjustments by Principal Are VAT-Applicable Services in Arcomet Case
- Understanding VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing: Insights from Arcomet Case C-726/23
- VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Insights from Acromet Towercranes Case
- CJEU Ruling: Transfer Pricing Adjustments Impact VAT in Arcomet Case (C-726/23)
- EU Court of Justice Rules Transfer Pricing Payments Subject to VAT in Arcomet Case
