The company P Sp. z o.o. (‘P’) is the taxable person in question, referred to as the employer, and the employee involved is referred to as P.K. An audit found that fraudulent VAT invoices were issued under the employer’s name, and the recipients claimed input VAT based on these invoices. The employer’s internal investigation revealed that the fraudulent invoices were issued and sold by an employee without the knowledge or consent of the company’s board. The employee used the employer’s details to issue fake invoices for fraudulent purposes. The dispute is whether the employer is liable for the VAT under Article 203 of the VAT Directive. The Court noted that the employer may be liable if it failed to exercise due diligence to prevent the employee from using its identification details for fraudulent purposes. It is left to the local tax authority or court to determine whether the employer exercised due diligence in this case.
Source KPMG
See also
- C-442/22 (P Sp. z o.o.) – Judgment – Employee who issued empty invoice is responsible to report them
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Liability to pay VAT – VAT shall be payable by any person who enters the VAT on an invoice (Art. 203)
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Clarifies 0% VAT Documentation for Intra-Community Supplies: Key 2025 Ruling for Businesses
- Key CBAM Changes for EU Importers Effective January 2026: New Thresholds and Reporting Rules
- GENA Urges EU to Harmonise and Expand Digital E-Invoicing in Public Procurement Reform
- Audit Office Monitors Council’s VAT Filing Amid Potential £600k HMRC Fine Risk
- EU VAT Gap 2023: Key Findings, Country Comparisons, and Policy Insights from Mind the Gap Report












