The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X, a BIG-registered nurse, performed VAT-exempt services and therefore was not entitled to deduct input VAT. The court also found the 10% default penalty of €1649 to be appropriate and necessary. X, who cooperated with the audit, failed to make it plausible that there was an absence of all guilt. The court upheld the penalty despite the audit period being exceeded by one month, citing X’s failure to appear for a scheduled hearing on two occasions without notice.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
