- The case involves non-economic educational activities.
- The contributions received from students cannot be considered as compensation.
- The Court agrees with the lower court’s decision that the education services provided by the appellant are non-economic activities.
- The contributions received from some students only cover a small portion of the costs.
- The difference between the contributions and the total costs is funded from general resources.
- This indicates that the contributions should be treated as a levy rather than compensation.
- Therefore, the education services do not qualify as economic activities.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Classification of Parking Lot Parcels with Paving: A-G’s Conclusion on VAT Status
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline