- The Court of Justice of the European Union is addressing the complex relationship between Transfer Pricing (TP) and VAT.
- The case involves TP adjustments that align the profit of a company with activities and risks according to OECD guidelines.
- The dispute revolves around three invoices issued by a Belgian parent company to its Romanian subsidiary.
- The Romanian tax authorities argue that the invoices relate to management services and request evidence of their necessity.
- The Belgian tax authorities determined that the invoices concern a provision of services.
- The tax inspectors refused the right to deduct VAT for two invoices but retained the collected VAT.
Source: vat-consult.be
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-513/24 – Guidelines of the AG of the EU for VAT deduction for Czech hospitals
- ViDA Implementation Strategy: How VAT Rules Will Change
- Comments on ECJ C-409/24-C411/24 – Accommodation landlords must split supplies for VAT purposes (AG Opinion)
- Comments on ECJ C-726/23 (Arcomet Towercranes): Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Ruling
- ICS2 Implementation Delayed: Businesses Can Use ICSNI for ENS Declarations Until December 2025
