- The Court of Justice of the European Union is addressing the complex relationship between Transfer Pricing (TP) and VAT.
- The case involves TP adjustments that align the profit of a company with activities and risks according to OECD guidelines.
- The dispute revolves around three invoices issued by a Belgian parent company to its Romanian subsidiary.
- The Romanian tax authorities argue that the invoices relate to management services and request evidence of their necessity.
- The Belgian tax authorities determined that the invoices concern a provision of services.
- The tax inspectors refused the right to deduct VAT for two invoices but retained the collected VAT.
Source: vat-consult.be
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Briefing document & Podcast: EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Explained: ”VAT Rates” (Art. 93-129a)
- Briefing document & Podcast: EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Explained: ”Deductions” (Art. 167-192)
- Briefing document & Podcast: EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Explained: ”Exemptions” (Art. 131-166)
- Less Known Facts from the EU VAT Gap Report
- Briefing document & Podcast: EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Explained: The concept of ”Taxable persons” (Art. 9-13)













