Valentina Heights, a Bulgarian company, engaged in tourism, restaurant, hotel, and travel organization activities. They rented a tourist apartment complex known as “Valentina Heights” in Bansko, Bulgaria, owned by private individuals. The owners agreed to let Valentina Heights manage, maintain, and rent the apartments on their behalf. Valentina Heights applied a 9% VAT rate to the accommodation in the complex. The municipality initially classified the complex as a guesthouse with 9 rooms and 19 beds, but the certificate was later revoked. The Bulgarian Tax Authority imposed a tax assessment for the period when Valentina Heights did not have a classification certificate, and therefore incorrectly applied a 9% VAT rate. The ECJ ruled that a national regulation requiring a classification certificate for applying a reduced VAT rate to accommodation provided by hotels and similar establishments must be limited to specific aspects of these services and comply with the principle of fiscal neutrality.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
See also
- C-733/22 (Valentina Heights) – Judgment – The eligibility for a reduced VAT rate for hotels cannot be contingent upon possessing a categorization certificate
- Roadtrip through ECJ cases: Focus on ”VAT rates” (Art. 96-99)
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CBAM: Expansion to cast iron, steel and complex metal products from 2028
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 AG Opinion
- Comments on ECJ C-639/24: Limits on Denying VAT Exemption for Intra-Community Supplies
- EU Advocate General: VAT Implications of Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Car Distribution Cases
- EU and Member States Introduce €2-€5 Parcel Customs Fees Ahead of 2026 Reforms
