- The municipality X is responsible for the separate collection or collection and sorting of packaging waste from household waste.
- X receives a compensation for these activities but has not paid VAT on these payments.
- X has been issued with VAT assessments as a result.
- X has also claimed a contribution from the BCF for the VAT incurred on the costs of these activities, but these contributions have been reclaimed from X.
- The court in The Hague rules that X provides a service to the packaging industry, which is subject to VAT.
- X’s argument based on the principle of legitimate expectations is rejected.
- The court also rejects X’s claim that the reverse charge mechanism applies.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Fraud Lessons: The Perils of Mixing Business and Personal Finances
- Entrepreneur Bound by Settlement Agreement in Tax Reassessment Case on Luxury Watches Sales
- Financial Application Disruption at Customs Halts Payments, Urgent Payment Requests Possible
- New VAT Rules for Mixed-Use Buildings: Changes Effective July 1, 2025
- Guidelines for VAT Rates on Mixed-Use Properties Effective July 1, 2025