The ECJ issued a preliminary ruling (Case No. C-537/22) regarding Hungarian VAT deduction rules. The case involved a Hungarian wholesale business acquiring office supplies from a domestic company, with the Tax Authorities alleging fraudulent transactions. The Tax Agency refused the VAT deduction, citing VAT fraud. The ruling clarified that the Tax Authority can deny VAT deduction if there is a lack of diligence, must prove elements of VAT fraud, and taxpayers must exercise due care to avoid indirect participation in VAT fraud.
Source GlobalVATcompliance
See also
- ECJ C-537/22 (Global Ink Trade) – Judgment – Deduction of VAT in case of a missing additional evidence/fictitious transactions
- Summary of ECJ C-537/22 (Global Ink Trade): VAT Deduction, Primacy of EU Law and Taxpayer Obligations
- ECJ C-537/22 confirms that the principle of the primacy of EU law establishes that EU law takes precedence over the laws of Member States
- Join the Linkedin Group on Global E-Invoicing/E-Reporting/SAF-T Developments, click HERE
Click on the logo to visit the website
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-101/24 (Xyrality) – Judgment on app stores as VAT commissionaires
- ECJ Confirms Deemed Reseller Rule for App Store In-App Purchases
- VAT Challenges in Toll Manufacturing: Goods vs Services Classification Issues
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 case pending
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-580/16 (Hans Bühler) – Late submission of recapitulative statements should not disqualify a business from exemptions
