- The case involves penalties for inaccuracies in VAT returns and a personal liability notice given to a director
- The company’s appeal against VAT assessments was unsuccessful at the First-tier Tribunal, Upper Tribunal, and Court of Appeal
- The company was in liquidation by the time of the litigation against the assessments
- The appellant applied to amend grounds of appeal against the personal liability notice, but the application was objected to on the basis of it being an abuse of process
- The key issue in the case is whether there was sufficient identification between the company and the appellant to hold the appellant responsible for the outcome of the company litigation
- The application for the new ground was refused, but the application was permitted for other grounds related to deliberate inaccuracy and attribution to the then-director.
Source: bailii.org
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust vs HMRC: VAT Exemption Dispute on Locum Medical Practitioners
- HMRC Guidance: How to correct VAT errors and make adjustments or claims (VAT Notice 700/45)
- Supreme Court Decision Mandates Prudential to Pay VAT on £9.3 Million Success Fees
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Grouping and Time of Supply in Prudential Case
- High Court Rules in Favor of Hotelbeds UK on Input Tax Recovery Without VAT Invoices