Recently, a judgment of the District Court of Noord-Holland was published in which a dispute between a supplier of plaster shoes and the Tax and Customs Administration was ruled. The Tax and Customs Administration argued that the 21% rate should have been applied to the sale of plaster shoes and imposed additional assessments and interest decisions on the supplier, who applied the reduced VAT rate.
Source: www.btwinstituut.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
- No VAT Fiscal Unity: Foundation and BV Lack Required Financial Interdependence, Court Rules
- No Breach of Legitimate Expectation in VAT Reassessment for Foundation X, Court Rules
- No VAT group due to lack of majority of material control
