- The company [ALFA] is seeking clarification on the use of VAT credit offset for companies that have not passed the “operational test” according to the law.
- The company received a tax assessment notice for IRAP taxes and a refund of VAT for 2009, based on the grounds of non-operability.
- The company filed a lawsuit against the tax office, but it was rejected in the first instance.
- The case was referred to a higher court for lack of necessary joint litigation with the partner.
- The higher court ordered the case to be sent back to the lower court for further proceedings.
- The lower court ruled in favor of the company and ordered the tax office to reimburse the litigation expenses.
- The tax office appealed the decision, but it was rejected.
- The tax office then appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the tax office.
- The company was requested to repay the VAT and pay the IRAP taxes with interest and penalties.
- The company requested a payment plan, which was granted by the tax collection agency.
- The company’s operational status for the years 2009, 2010, and 2011 was as follows: 2009 and 2010 were considered non-operational, while 2011 was exempt from the law’s provisions for companies that meet certain criteria.
- The company’s VAT credit for 2009, once repaid in installments, is not considered lost.
Source: agenziaentrate.gov.it
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Italy"
- CPB: Early Exemption from Compliance Visa for VAT Credit Offsetting up to 70,000 Euros
- 10% VAT Applies to Musical Entertainment Accessory to Restaurant Services, Rules Italian Supreme Court
- Deductibility of Non-Deductible Pro Rata VAT: Cash or Accrual Basis for Businesses?
- Expense Recharging Between Unassociated Professionals: VAT Rules and Invoicing Obligations Explained
- EU VAT Showdown: Is User Data a Taxable Payment for Free Digital Services?