- BV A was part of a group and its subsidiary BV B was involved in a real estate project.
- BV B purchased two properties and took out a bank mortgage of €4,750,000.
- The municipality changed the zoning plan, preventing the development of the project and reducing the value of the properties.
- BV B stopped making payments on the mortgage.
- Mr. X was already involved in the project due to his role in other companies within the group.
- The bank was willing to continue the credit if certain conditions were met.
- The source of the information is a court ruling from the Zeeland-West-Brabant region.
- The relevant law is article 36a of the Invorderingswet 1990.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT on Management Services for CDC Pension Fund: Not a Common Investment Fund, Appeal Dismissed
- Court Upholds Fine for Late VAT Filing; Objection Partially Granted, Penalty Deemed Appropriate
- VAT Zero Rate Denied for Export of Horse Shares: Appeal Unsuccessful, Tax Assessment Upheld
- VAT Exemption Denied for Services to Pension Funds with CDC and DC Schemes, Court Rules
- VAT Exemption for Pension Fund Management: Distinction Between Accumulation and Payout Phases Disputed
