- Realreed owns a property called Chelsea Cloisters in London with 656 self-contained apartments.
- The VAT treatment of the letting of 235 apartments is in question.
- Realreed argues that the letting of the apartments is exempt under The VAT Act 1994.
- Chelsea Cloisters operates like a residential building and does not offer hotel-like services.
- HMRC argues that the apartments are not exempt due to the provision of sleeping accommodation in a similar establishment to a hotel.
- The court determines that Chelsea Cloisters is an establishment in potential competition with the hotel sector.
- The FTT finds that Chelsea Cloisters is suitable for use by “visitors or travellers”.
- The VAT treatment of the serviced apartments is not exempt.
Source: marcusward.co
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK VAT Rules on Online Prize Draws Face Scrutiny Amid New Voluntary Code and Industry Growth
- How UK Businesses Accidentally Trigger US State Sales Tax Through Ecommerce and Economic Nexus
- Director Liable for VAT Fraud and PAYE/NIC on Withdrawals: Ellis & Anor v HMRC (2026)
- UK VAT Gap Rises to £11.9bn in 2024–25, HMRC Reports 6.5% Shortfall
- Luzha v HMRC: VAT Late Submission Penalties Upheld, No Reasonable Excuse Found, Appeal Dismissed














