- The ECJ case P-GmbH limited the scope of Art. 203 of the EU VAT Directive.
- If there is no risk of a VAT loss, a VAT liability does not arise.
- The plaintiff charged VAT on invoices for postal services, but later the tax office recognized them as VAT exempt.
- The Fiscal Court Cologne upheld the lawsuit and recognized the plaintiff’s services as VAT exempt.
- Sec. 14c para. 1 of the German VAT Act / Art. 203 of the EU VAT Directive does not apply if there is no risk of a VAT loss.
- The majority of the invoices were issued to persons not entitled to claim input VAT deduction.
- The court followed the principles of the P-GmbH case.
Source: kmlz.de
See also C-378/21 (P GmbH) – Judgment – No VAT liability in case wrongly charged VAT for B2C transactions
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Confirms TP Adjustments as VAT-Applicable Services, Requires Supporting Documentation
- Court of Justice Rules on VAT for Intra-Group Services and Evidence Requirements for Deductions
- ECJ Rules Compensation Payments in Transfer Pricing as Taxable Supply for VAT Purposes
- ECJ Rules Non-Transactional Profit Adjustments by Principal Are VAT-Applicable Services in Arcomet Case
- Understanding VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing: Insights from Arcomet Case C-726/23