- The ECJ case P-GmbH limited the scope of Art. 203 of the EU VAT Directive.
- If there is no risk of a VAT loss, a VAT liability does not arise.
- The plaintiff charged VAT on invoices for postal services, but later the tax office recognized them as VAT exempt.
- The Fiscal Court Cologne upheld the lawsuit and recognized the plaintiff’s services as VAT exempt.
- Sec. 14c para. 1 of the German VAT Act / Art. 203 of the EU VAT Directive does not apply if there is no risk of a VAT loss.
- The majority of the invoices were issued to persons not entitled to claim input VAT deduction.
- The court followed the principles of the P-GmbH case.
Source: kmlz.de
See also C-378/21 (P GmbH) – Judgment – No VAT liability in case wrongly charged VAT for B2C transactions
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Council Approves Customs Duty Cuts on Ukrainian Agri-Food Products
- EC Report: Three EU Countries Account for 75% of VAT Rate Deviations
- EU Report Reveals Major Disparities in VAT Rate Exception Applications
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on Place of Supply of Intra-Community Acquisitions – ”Triangulation” (Art. 42)
- Briefing document & Podcast: C-536/08 (X) and C-539/08 (Facet Trading) – No deduction on Intra-EU acquisitions taxed at the MS of identification of the purchaser, instead of the destination
