- The debtor’s collection claim must be made by any legally admissible means of proof that credibly demonstrates the claim.
- Any form of communication or delivery that allows for proof of the submission of the claim, the identity of the sender and recipient, as well as the result and date of delivery, will be valid.
- The means of communication used must have guarantees equivalent to judicial claims or notarial requirements.
- The rules on means and evaluation of evidence in the Civil Code and the Law of Civil Procedure apply to tax procedures, unless otherwise specified by law.
- The burden of proof lies with the taxpayer in tax proceedings.
- The taxpayer must determine and present the evidence that justifies the requirements set out in the regulations.
- The competent authorities of the AEAT will use their powers of verification and analyze the circumstances in each specific case.
- The corresponding judicial bodies may also be involved in the analysis of the evidence.
Source: audiconsultores-etlglobal.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- Spain: Key VAT Compliance Deadlines for January and February 2026
- Spain Opens Temporary SII Exit Window After VERI*FACTU Mandate Delay to 2027
- Express Revocation of VAT Special Regime Renunciation Required; Tacit Revocation Not Permitted
- Spain Postpones Verifactu Ordinance to 2027, Grants Exceptional SII Opt-Out Until January 2026
- Spain Opens Special SII Exit Window After VERI*FACTU Deadline Postponement for Voluntary Participants













