The provision of an intermission drink at a theater performance is considered an additional service that shares the same tax treatment as the main performance. The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that it is part of a single composite performance, and tax authorities cannot differentiate by rate, even though the amount for each element can be determined within the total compensation paid by the consumer.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Join our Linkedin Group on ”VAT Rates – Legislative changes”, click HERE
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Classification of Parking Lot Parcels with Paving: A-G’s Conclusion on VAT Status
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
