- The Court of Appeal in The Hague has ruled that the deduction of VAT has been correctly corrected.
- The zero rate has been incorrectly applied as it is not credible that the goods have left the Netherlands.
- The penalty has been correctly imposed.
- The court agrees with the lower court’s decision to correct the deduction of VAT for invoices from BV 2.
- The court finds that the taxpayer did not have the funds to pay BV 2 and could not expect payment from GmbH 1.
- The court does not find any evidence that the taxpayer intended to pay the invoices from BV 2 or reimburse GmbH 3 for the advanced amounts.
- The court states that the invoice to GmbH 1 was not uncollectible in the relevant period.
- The court concludes that a refund under article 29, paragraph 1, of the VAT Act is not possible for the invoice to GmbH 1 in the relevant period.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss