- The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that Y bv is not liable for VAT under the reverse charge mechanism and cannot mention it on its invoices.
- VOF X, as the customer, is also not entitled to deduct the VAT.
- Y bv provided staff to VOF X for cleaning hotel rooms, and VOF X deducted the turnover tax charged by Y BV. The court upheld the inspector’s decision that the reverse charge arrangement applies.
- VOF X’s appeal was found to be unfounded, and the default fine was reduced due to exceeding the reasonable period.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026
