Will the payment VAT exemption survive a narrow interpretation?
The Supreme Court (SC) has unanimously dismissed the appeal of Target Group Limited (“Target“) against the court of appeal’s decision that loan administration services Target provided to a bank (including operating loan accounts and processing payments from borrowers) were not exempt from VAT. The SC decided, considering the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case law, that the payment VAT exemption should be interpreted “narrowly.”
It held that, for the payment VAT exemption to apply, it is necessary to be involved in the actual execution of the transfer or payment, which requires “functional participation and performance.” It is not enough to give instructions to another party, even if it triggers a transfer or payment. Target was merely giving instructions.
The decision is relevant for all UK businesses that are active in the payment sector, from Payment Service Providers (PSPs) and in-house payment entities to e-money and crypto providers and wider payment schemes.
Source Baker & McKenzie
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust vs HMRC: VAT Exemption Dispute on Locum Medical Practitioners
- HMRC Guidance: How to correct VAT errors and make adjustments or claims (VAT Notice 700/45)
- Supreme Court Decision Mandates Prudential to Pay VAT on £9.3 Million Success Fees
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Grouping and Time of Supply in Prudential Case
- High Court Rules in Favor of Hotelbeds UK on Input Tax Recovery Without VAT Invoices
